We are leaders in cosmetic surgery, facial aesthetics, and medically supervised weight loss, serving the entire San Francisco Bay area. Whether you live in the Bay Area or are coming in from out of town, we’re happy to answer any questions you may have on your path to your new self. Book your cosmetic surgery intro call or Med Spa consultation today and take the first step towards realizing the look you’ve always wanted for yourself.
Macrolane Vs Calf Implants
Macrolane is a hyaluronic acid filler that was once used for body contouring, but it was pulled from the market around 2012 after concerns about interfering with mammography and inconsistent, temporary results. It isn't a current option, so this really comes down to calf implants versus fat grafting. Calf implants are solid silicone shaped to sit under the fascia, giving a defined, predictable contour that's essentially permanent, but they carry the usual implant risks: malposition, capsular tightening, and a surgical pocket that can get infected. Fat grafting uses your own tissue, so there's no foreign material, but results depend on how much fat survives the transfer, and some patients need a second round to get the volume they want. Neither is inherently better; it depends on how much correction you need and your anatomy. Worth discussing both options, along with your goals, with a board-certified plastic surgeon who can examine your calves in person.
Clinical Context
Calf implants are solid, shaped silicone placed beneath the leg's fascia, so their contour is set once swelling resolves. Fat grafting transfers your own fat cells, which must form a new blood supply to survive; any fat that doesn't take is reabsorbed. Because of this, fat-grafted volume can look fuller right after surgery and then settle as the body reabsorbs what didn't survive. Both procedures require a surgeon experienced with calf anatomy to avoid nerve and vascular injury.
